Trees of Our Times: Representing Arboreal Temporalities in Ali Smith’s Autumn and Richard Powers’ The Overstory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46863/ecocene.63Keywords:
critical plant studies, botanical humanities, ecocriticism, contemporary literature, Ali Smith, Richard PowersAbstract
This paper examines the nature of tree time and how it is represented in Ali Smith’s Autumn (2016) and Richard Powers’ The Overstory (2018). It argues that trees’ relationship to time is different from humans’ and sensibility towards their temporal otherness is necessary if we are to enter into responsible relationships with trees, as well as the non-human world. Both Autumn and The Overstory facilitate such ecological awareness by staging human-tree encounters where the alterity of tree time is foregrounded. While Smith engages with tree time in its cyclical form, highlighting its heteronomy, Powers provides a good example of how the challenges of representing the linear, longue durée temporality of trees can be overcome. In both novels, the authors’ engagement with tree time and its alterity gives rise to ideologically challenging gestures at long-held ideas of human- nature relationships. The Overstory unsettles anthropocentric understandings of time. Meanwhile, the cyclical form of arboreal temporality represented in Autumn evokes a pre-modern, pre- capitalist conception of time, which works to reveal the entanglements between the natural world and mankind.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Khanh Nguyen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ecocene does not ask authors to transfer any copyrights to the journal. The author(s) retain all copyrights of their articles. However, authors grant the publisher non-exclusive publishing rights to publish the articles. Please note that Ecocene publishes only original materials, that is, works that have not been previously published elsewhere. Ecocene uses a Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.0).